goat anti mouse igg2a human ads hrp secondary antibody (SouthernBiotech)
Structured Review

Goat Anti Mouse Igg2a Human Ads Hrp Secondary Antibody, supplied by SouthernBiotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 223 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+igg2a+1080+05+antibodies/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__07__709392-132-13-20?v=SouthernBiotech
Average 95 stars, based on 223 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Dirty mice better recapitulate key features of mRNA vaccine immunogenicity observed in humans"
Article Title: Dirty mice better recapitulate key features of mRNA vaccine immunogenicity observed in humans
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.07.709392
Figure Legend Snippet: mRNA vaccination in dirty mice requires booster vaccination and is less durable than in SPF mice. (A) Model for generating and vaccinating dirty mice, days (d) indicated. (B–E) Serum antibody responses in SPF (black) and dirty (red) mice. Illustration generated with images from NIAID NIH BioArt. (B) Anti-S1 RBD IgG levels over 61 days post-vaccination (N=48), expressed as area under the curve (AUC) from serial dilution ELISAs (OD 405 ). (C) Quantification of serum IgG specific to SARS-CoV-2 WT Spike (AU/ml) through day 151 post-immunization. (D) Neutralizing antibody titers over 61 days post-vaccination, expressed as FRNT 50 . (E) Cross-reactive serum IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 Spike variants (WT, BA.1, BA.5) at day 61 (AU/ml). Data represent individual mice with mean ± SEM; p-values determined by Welch’s T-test 2 . (F) Antibody clearance from serum of mock-injected (N=3) and α’NP-injected SPF (N=4) and dirty mice (N=4), expressed as α’NP IgG2a AUC. N=3-4 AUC values per timepoint are represented on the graph aside from mock d59 with N=2, with standard deviation indicated. Antibody levels in B, C, and E were determined using MSD-ECLIA. Antibody levels in F were determined with ELISA.
Techniques Used: Generated, Serial Dilution, Injection, Standard Deviation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: The dirty mouse model is stable over time and season. (A) Percent of mice in each cohoused cohort that were seropositive for murine pathogens. Data corresponds to mice shown in . Only pathogens with seropositivity among the mice are depicted, additional pathogens tested in panel are listed in Materials and Methods. (B) Correlation of T cell activation status (percent of CD44+-hi expressing cells among CD8a+ T cells) with anti-S1 RBD IgG levels at 60 days post-prime (30 days post-boost). Antibody levels are represented as AUC. N=21 mice. Linear regression model equation and 95% confidence interval is shown on graph. (C) Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of serology panel data from cohoused mice. Each dot represents a dirty laboratory mouse. Distance between points represents similarity of pathogen exposure history. Points are colored by the year that the experiment occurred. Data is representative of N=1014 mice. (D) Comparison of average percent CD44+-Hi among CD8a+ T cells (left) and average pathogen richness (right) from mice in panel C across seasons. Error bars represent standard deviation. (E) Experimental design used to generate the double co-housed dirty mouse model. Illustration generated with images from NIAID NIH BioArt. (F) Heatmaps of seroprevalence against a panel of murine pathogens in single co-housed (60 days) and double co-housed (120 days) mice. Squares are divided into triangles representing data from two independent experimental replicates. (G) Frequency of activated CD8a+/CD44-Hi T cells in single and double co-housed mice assessed at days 60 and 121. Bars represent mean ± SEM. (H) Anti-S1 RBD IgG log10 endpoint titers (OD 405 ) 30 days post-prime and -booster (N=20) in SPF (black), single (red), and double (purple) co-housed mice. Data represent individual mice with horizontal bars indicating mean and brackets indicate fold-change relative to SPF. Antibody levels in panels B and H were determined using ELISA.
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Expressing, Comparison, Standard Deviation, Generated, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

